Timing is everything.....
Pfizer doesn't make mistakes, they make choices
A big COVID study of 1.7 million Swedes just came out. Half were vaxxed and half were not. I don’t want to dive too deep into this report - except to point out how it confirms the decreasing efficacy of the mRNA ‘vaccine’ against infection AND adds decreasing ability to prevent serious disease.
Their figures make the points nicely.
First, infection.
They compared SYMPTOMATIC cases (not just PCR positive) between the two groups.
The vaccine efficacy (VE) peaked at about two months after the second shot, but then quickly fell off until the ‘vaccinated’ were WORSE off than if they had never been jabbed by eight months. (This transition to negative VE appears much sooner if using PCR-positives! The ‘vaxxed’ are more likely to spread COVID by 6 months post-shot than if they had never gotten the drug.)
The data on ‘severe infections’ (hospitalizations or deaths) is better, but not great.
As you can see, VE against severe outcomes also peaks at about two months and then drops quickly (not quite as steeply); but, by seven months, the vaccinated only have 25% protection compared to the unvaccinated.
It is much worse news for some of the most at-risk subgroups: the Swedish paper showed negative VE for serious cases in most men, people over 80, and the obese (among others) by 6 months.
After crossing into negative VE territory, people in those groups are at MUCH higher risk of infection, hospitalization, and death than if they had never been vaccinated!
And it looks like anyone who takes the jab will soon follow suit (unless you get booster after booster after booster).
Once you start on that vaccine treadmill - how could you EVER get off???
This drop in efficacy matches perfectly with data from Qatar, the UK, and the USA that I covered just a few days ago in this post.
So thinking about Pfizer and their ‘clinical trials’….
At which point above do you think Pfizer ended their trials and reported their data on the efficacy of vaccines???
If you guessed “A” and “C” you are correct. Give yourself a lollipop.
Remember that this is not Pfizer’s first experience with mRNA vaccines or clinical trials. They did not happen to end the trials 90 days after the second dose. They did not make an error when they stopped collecting data that would have shown their ‘vaccines’ failing quickly over the next several months. They made choices that would most effectively sell their product.
And those choices worked (at selling the product, not at protecting us from COVID).
Remember all that press about “the vaccine is 94% effective”, etc???
This headline is from the BBC (but there are hundreds of examples to choose from)
Not so impressive any more, is it?
This data explains clearly why Pfizer and Moderna ended their ‘trials’ after 90 days, gave the vaccine to the control groups, and stopped collecting data.
They already knew what was going to happen.
They had seen it many times in animal models and in previous attempts at human vaccines.
So, when you see headlines like this about vaccine efficacy in young kids, should we trust them again?
Fool me once, shame on you….
Fool me twice….